Moderation
So this has been my major concern in the last few days.
One of AGOv3 objectives is to be an hight quality artwork repository for GNOME desktop. Thus, there is the need for moderation. Since AGO’s development community is short on staff we need to find a efficient way to have submissions checked out. On the other hand the community should also have the opportunity to say what they think should or shouldn’t be accepted.
In response to the problem I’ve already gather several ideas among the community and tried to compile what I think is a good solution to the problem.
- Every work should be submitted to an initial moderation process where it is voted by several moderators if it is accepted or not
- After being accepted, it will be made fully public. Users can now vote on it. This votes will decide if a work will stay in the system or not.
- In case of having a negative rating for a certain period of time it is removed from the public gallery and moved to the author’s draft folder.
- The most active artwork developers are perfect candidates to become moderators. That can be seen as a way to recognize and award their commitment to the community
You’ll find a complete description of the process in here.
However I’m not fully happy with this solution. So if you have any suggestion, please, do tell.
So it seems that my proposal got accepted in